Over five decades ago, multiple Hugo and Nebula Award winner Frederick Pohl wrote an editorial entitled “Where the Jobs Go”, which appeared in the April, 1966 edition of of Galaxy Science Fiction<\/em>.\u00a0 The impetus for his essay was the New York City Transit Strike of January, 1966 (1).\u00a0 That event created an intellectual springboard for musings about the relationship between automation, information technology and employment, particularly in terms of the diminution – if not outright elimination – of existing occupations.\u00a0 Writing in the midst of the strike – with the cancellation of bus and subway transportation affecting millions of New Yorkers – the issues Pohl raised are even more pressing today than in 1966.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/a>Pohl presented a specific example of the effects of technological change on employment, through his discussion about the future of publishing, with representatives of the Philadelphia-based Institute for Scientific Information (a.k.a. “ISI”) (2), and, Simon and Schuster.\u00a0 He clearly foresaw what today would be termed \u201con demand\u201d publishing.\u00a0 Though he didn’t specifically estimate when<\/em> this would occur, he understood that for the replication of printed information, the central dependence on and necessity for human activity, and in turn specific job categories, could in time be eliminated.\u00a0 In the mid-1960s, this was in the areas of linotype operation, printing, binding, storage, and sales.\u00a0 Bypassing and eventually supplanting the these steps – and the human role in them – could enable a customer; a user; a consumer; to produce a book, \u201con order, anywhere in the world\u201d. <\/span><\/p>\n

Which is where we\u2019re at today.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

Another notable aspect of Pohl\u2019s editorial was the realization that there is a natural and perhaps inevitable tendency to perceive the uses, effects, and implications of any new technology through the context of the past.\u00a0 Pohl\u2019s \u201ctwelfth-century armaments expert\u201d has appeared throughout history in all venues of human endeavor: technological, military, economic, educational, and political. \u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

Pohl’s other examples included bank tellers, retail clerks, and accounts.\u00a0 he realized that the commonality among these occupations was their general predictability and codification.\u00a0 His prediction: Technological advances in electronics (“black boxes”) would eventually supplant established work activities, let alone categories of employment.<\/span><\/p>\n

Pohl didn’t really address issues that would in time (our time) be wrought by these changes.\u00a0 Instead, he concluded by simply suggesting – simplistically and optimistically; resignedly and pragmatically – their acceptance:\u00a0 “Postponing this revolution or slowing it down isn\u2019t going to make us very well indeed; let\u2019s swallow it and get it over!”\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

Perhaps he couldn’t have foreseen – could anyone? – the magnitude to which the issues he discussed – in terms of both physical and intellectual activity; in terms of social cohesion; in terms of geopolitical stability; in terms of ethics and morality – would rise to prominence only a few decades later.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

His editorial follows below…<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/p>\n

WHERE THE JOBS GO<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

As this is written, the city of New York is tying itself in knots because of a strike in the Transport Workers Union.\u00a0 All of the city subways, and nearly all of its buses, are idle.\u00a0 Workers can\u2019t get to their jobs; shoppers can\u2019t get to stores; salesmen can\u2019t call on their customers; theatergoers can\u2019t reach the plays for which they have bought tickets months in advance \u2013 in a word, the normal operations of the city have stopped.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

All of this costs money.\u00a0 The current guess is that the paralysis of the city is costing it something like $100,000,000 a day or substantially more than the combined expense of the space program, the war in Vietnam and Medicare put together.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

It is our opinion that this is only a beginning, because it begins to look clear to us that the real squeeze brought about by automation is going to express itself \u2013 has already begun to express itself \u2013 in a wave of strikes such as we\u2019ve never seen before.\u00a0 <\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

True, automation is not technically an issue in this strike.\u00a0 The TWU had its confrontation with the machines \u2013 the \u201cHeadless Horseman\u201d, as Mike Quill called it \u2013 when the subways installed the first automated tracks a few years ago.\u00a0 At union insistence the Transit Authority provided a standby motorman on the train, whose principal efforts consisted of walking from one end of the train to the other each time it came to the end of its run.\u00a0 The automated was destroyed accidentally in a fire after a year\u2019s trial \u2013 apparently to the unspoken relief of all parties.\u00a0 There has been no announcement of any plan to build another, but we would judge that its ghost haunts the negotiating tables.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Nearly all of the subway jobs involved are relatively unskilled \u2013 changemakers, conductors, station guards, motormen \u2013 with only a comparatively small number involved in maintenance, repair, construction and other more technically demanding jobs.\u00a0 And this is the edge that cuts.\u00a0 The subway workers have not been through the automation shakeout, when a large number of repetitive jobs are obsoleted and the jobs that are left require more training and more skill.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

In other words, their productive capacity has not yet been multiplied by the machine factor.\u00a0 This produces two opposed points of view, both of them unarguable.\u00a0 Say the subway administrators and the public at large: These jobs just don\u2019t call for that kind of money, and besides it would make the expense of running the subways ridiculously high.\u00a0 Say the subway workers:\u00a0 Other people putting in the same hours earn much more; we have to live in the same world with them, we have to compete with them to buy what we want in the stores, and we can\u2019t do it unless we make as much money as they do.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

This is the classical formula for the hardest-fought wars: both sides are right.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Is there any way to avoid more and even worse strikes than this one in the transition to the Cybernetic Age?<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

We doubt it very much.\u00a0 Certainly what is happening now is not the final struggle; in fact, the issues haven\u2019t even been joined.\u00a0 The present subway strike is only a taste of what will come when \u201cHeadless Horsemen\u201d are beginning to come out of the shops for all the major routes \u2013 and that day cannot be far off.\u00a0 Remember the newspaper strike of a couple years ago.\u00a0 That one was indeed fought on the issue of automation; but we have it on the word of the man who designed the systems that triggered the strike, Eugene Leonard, that it was the wrong fight at the wrong time over the wrong issues \u2013 because the systems that caused the strike were already obsolete at the time.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Not long ago we took part in a radio program with the aforementioned Gene Leonard, along with Arthur Elias of the Institute for Scientific Information and Henry Simon of Simon & Schuster, talking about the future of the publishing business in the Cybernetic Age.\u00a0 We started by discussing automated typesetting, and it took exactly twelve minutes by the studio clock before we had reached a proposal for high-speed facsimile machines which would produce a book to your order, anywhere in the world.\u00a0 In twelve minutes we not only got rid of the human linotype operator, but abolished the linotype itself and went on to obsolete the printing press, the binderies, the warehouses and the publishing house\u2019s road salesmen.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Is such a new kind of publishing technologically feasible right now?\u00a0 Certainly.\u00a0 Is it likely to come into being in the next few years?\u00a0 Certainly \u2013 cultural lag doesn\u2019t permit us to move that fast \u2013 but it, or something like it, is surely the shape of the publishing business some time in the future.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

We tend to think of automation\u2019s effect on our own jobs in terms of a wilier, cheaper competitor to do the same things we\u2019re doing right now.\u00a0 In the event it isn\u2019t going to be like that at all.\u00a0 An analogy: Suppose we resurrected some twelfth-century armaments expert and asked him how he thought we should employ the resources of modern technology to build weapons.\u00a0 No doubt he would be delighted; at once he would proceed to the fabrication of sharper lances, springier bows, truer shafts; and just how far would his troops get against H-bombs or napalm grenades?<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, our own outlook on our own jobs is largely medieval.\u00a0 The long lines of girls who used to assemble radio components don\u2019t get replaced by speedier machine assemblies; they get put out of business entirely by printed circuits.\u00a0 The stockbreeders who used to export power to the cities in the form of draft animals weren\u2019t hurt by competition from more efficient breeders.\u00a0 They simply ceased to have a market when the cities began exporting power to the farms, in the form of tractors and trucks.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Just so, in the long run (which may be measured in years or even months, these days), the bank tellers and retail clerks and accounting departments are not as likely to be replaced by whirring black boxes which accept ten-dollars bills and return change as they are to be retired completely by new electronic credit systems.\u00a0 The machines don\u2019t confine themselves to doing our jobs faster and more reliably \u2013 and cheaper.\u00a0 They make it unnecessary for a great many of our jobs to be done at all.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, we have the strikes.\u00a0 More and more of them, we would bet; worse and worse strikes, costing us more and more money.\u00a0 (Each day\u2019s loss to New York under the current subway strike would build a couple dozen handsome new schools.)<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

As long as Smith, operating at a job with only his own decision-making power, lives next door to Jones, whose decision-making power and consequent productivity is multiplied by the machine factor, they\u2019ll go on; because Smith eats as many pork chops in a year as Jones, his children wear out as many clothes, his car uses as much gas \u2013 and he wants as much money.\u00a0 Postponing this revolution or slowing it down isn\u2019t going to make us very well indeed; let\u2019s swallow it and get it over! \u2013 THE EDITOR<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

___________________
\n<\/u><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Akin to my prior post \u201cThe Past As Prologue: Technology, Work, and The Future \u2013 The View From 1947<\/a>\u201d (which was based on a New Republic<\/em> article \u201cCommunications Revolution\u201d from 1947) “this” post includes – below – links to a variety of articles, essays, and a video or two.\u00a0 They cover topics such as the effect of the Internet and technological change upon employment, and, social stability (both domestically and internationally); the return – with a searing vengeance – of the question of “class” in contemporary America (it never really<\/em> went away), whereby social status has become a zero-sum-game conferred through thought, belief, pose, and moral intent<\/em>; the impact of automation and robotics on employment; the economic and social corrosiveness of an informational oligopoly; the cognitive and cultural effects of \u201csocial” media.\u00a0 And, in an age of ostensible meritocracy, the not uncommon lacuna between intelligence and wisdom.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

The commonality among these writings is that most (not all) have been published since February of this year (2017), when I created that \u201cfirst\u201d post covering the 1947 essay from The New Republic<\/em>.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

For future blog posts concerning technology, economics, employment, and society, I hope to present links to similar writings, as they become available.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/p>\n

Thoughts of Note<\/span><\/p>\n

Uncertainty Without Principles<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/span>
\n Rod Dreher <\/strong>\u2013 Economic Insecurity<\/a><\/span>
\n (The American Conservative<\/em> \u2013 February 20, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Nicholas N. Eberstadt <\/strong>\u2013 Our Miserable 21st Century<\/a><\/span>
\n (Commentary<\/em> – February 15, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Esther Kaplan<\/strong> (Photography by David M. Barreda<\/strong>) – Losing Sparta: The Bitter Truth Behind the Gospel of Productivity<\/a>
\n<\/strong>(Virginia Quarterly Review<\/em> – Summer, 2014)<\/span><\/p>\n

Michael Lind \u2013 <\/strong>The New Class War<\/a><\/span>
\n (American Affairs<\/em> – Summer, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

David Ramli <\/strong>\u2013 Jack Ma Sees Decades of Pain as Internet Upends Older Economy<\/a><\/span>
\n (Bloomberg.com<\/em> – April 23, 2017)<\/span>
\n
\n<\/strong>Walter Scheidel <\/strong>\u2013 The Only Thing, Historically, That\u2019s Curbed Inequality: Catastrophe<\/a><\/span>
\n (The Atlantic<\/em> – February 21, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Yves Smith<\/strong> \u2013 How Financialization and the \u201cNew Economy\u201d Hurt Science and Engineering Grads<\/a><\/span>
\n (Naked Capitalism.com<\/em> – May 12, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

The New Zero Sum Game: Social Status in America* in the 21st Century<\/span> (The Aristocracy Reborn?)<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/span>
\n Matt Stoller <\/strong>– On Mocking Dying Working Class White People<\/a><\/span>
\n (Medium.com<\/em> – March 24, 2017)<\/span>
\n Twitter: <\/em>https:\/\/twitter.com\/matthewstoller<\/em><\/a>
\n<\/em><\/span>
\n Lambert Strether <\/strong>\u2013 Frank Rich, the Trump Voter, and Liberal Eliminationist Rhetoric<\/a><\/span>
\n (Naked Capitalism.com<\/em> – March 27, 2017)<\/span>
\n*And beyond.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

Avarice In the Guise of Altruism<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/span>
\n Kevin D. Williamson<\/strong> \u2013 Why Corporate Leaders Became Progressive Activists<\/a><\/span>
\n (National Review<\/em> – March 13, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Michael Hobbes <\/strong>\u2013 Saving the World, One Meaningless Buzzword at a Time<\/a><\/span>
\n (Foreign Policy<\/em> – February 21, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

Robotics and Jobs: The Unknown Future<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Nicholas Carr<\/strong> \u2013 The Digital Industrial Complex<\/a> <\/span>
\n (Rough Type<\/em> – May 12, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Nicholas Carr <\/strong>\u2013 The Robot Paradox<\/a><\/span>
\n (Rough Type<\/em> – May 16, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Tyler Cowen<\/strong> \u2013 Industrial Revolution Comparisons Aren\u2019t Comforting<\/a><\/span>
\n (Bloomberg.com<\/em> – February 16, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Jack Ma<\/strong> – World Leaders Must Make ‘Hard Choices’ or the Next 30 Years Will be Painful <\/a><\/span>(CNBC.com<\/em> – June 21, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Cade Metz <\/strong>– The AI Threat Isn\u2019t Skynet, It\u2019s the End of the Middle Class<\/a><\/span>
\n (Wired<\/em> – February 20, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Claire C. Miller <\/strong>\u2013 The Long Term Jobs Killer is not China.\u00a0 It\u2019s Automation<\/a><\/span>
\n (The New York Times<\/em> – December 21, 2016)<\/span><\/p>\n

Claire C. Miller <\/strong>\u2013 Why Are We Doing This to Ourselves<\/a><\/span>
\n (The New York Times<\/em> – December 28, 2016)<\/span><\/p>\n

Claire C. Miller <\/strong>\u2013 How to Prepare for an Automated Future<\/a><\/span>
\n (The New York Times<\/em> – May 3, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Rick Moran<\/strong> \u2013 The Huge Economic Issue That Washington Isn\u2019t Talking About<\/a><\/span>
\n (Pajamas Media<\/em> – February 12, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Clive Thompson <\/strong>\u2013 The Next Big Blue-Collar Job Is Coding<\/a><\/span>
\n (Wired<\/em> – February 8, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Victoria Turk<\/strong> \u2013 Don\u2019t Fear the Robots Taking Your Job, Fear the Monopolies Behind Them<\/a><\/span>
\n (Motherboard.com<\/em> – June 19, 2014)<\/span><\/p>\n

Marcus Wohlsen<\/strong> \u2013 When Robots Take All the Work, What\u2019ll Be Left for Us to Do?<\/a><\/span>
\n (Wired<\/em> – August 8, 2014) <\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

From Prose to Power.\u00a0 And, More Power<\/span>.
\n<\/strong>
\n<\/strong>Franklin Foer<\/strong> \u2013 Amazon Must Be Stopped: It’s too big.\u00a0 It’s cannibalizing the economy.\u00a0 It’s time for a radical plan.<\/a>
\n<\/strong>(The New Republic<\/em> – October 9, 2014<\/span><\/p>\n

George Packer<\/strong> \u2013 Cheap Words: Amazon is Good for Customers.\u00a0 But Is It Good for Books?<\/a><\/span>
\n (The New Yorker<\/em> – February 17 and 24, 2014)<\/span><\/p>\n

Matt Stoller<\/strong> – Why We Need to Break Up Amazon\u2026 And How to Do It<\/a>
\n<\/strong>(Medium.com<\/em> – October 16, 2014)<\/span>
\n Twitter: <\/em>https:\/\/twitter.com\/matthewstoller<\/em><\/a>
\n<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSocial” Media
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Nicholas Carr <\/strong>\u2013 Zuckerberg\u2019s World<\/a><\/span>
\n (Rough Type<\/em> – February 28, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Nicholas Carr<\/strong> \u2013 How Tec<\/a>hnology Created A Global Village and Put Us at Each Other\u2019s Throats<\/a><\/span>
\n (The Boston Globe<\/em> – April 21, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

David Foster<\/strong> – Mark Zuckerberg as Political and Social Philosopher<\/a><\/span>
\n (ChicagoBoyz.net<\/em> – March 7, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Annalee Newitz <\/strong>– Mark Zuckerberg\u2019s Manifesto is a Political Trainwreck<\/a><\/span>
\n (Arstechnica.com<\/em> – February 18, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

Intelligence Or Wisdom<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/span>
\n Andy Beckett<\/strong> \u2013 Accelerationism – How a Fringe Philosophy Predicted the Future We Live In<\/a><\/span>
\n (The Guardian<\/em> – June 5, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Gregory Ferenstein <\/strong>\u2013 The Disrupters: Silicon Valley elites\u2019 vision of the future<\/a><\/span>
\n (City Journal<\/em> – Winter, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

E.M. Oblomov<\/strong> \u2013 Intelligentsia Elegy: American Intellectuals are at Odds with the Workings of Democracy<\/a><\/span>
\n (City Journal<\/em> – February 3, 2017)<\/span><\/p>\n

Paul G. Raven<\/strong> \u2013 We\u2019re Reading Up on Transhumanism<\/a><\/span>
\n (Arcfinity.com<\/em> – 2014)<\/span><\/p>\n

Andrew Russell<\/strong> and Lee Vinsel <\/strong>\u2013 Hail the Maintainers: Capitalism Excels at Innovation But is Failing at\u00a0 Maintenance, and For Most Lives It Is Maintenance That Matters More<\/a><\/span>
\n (Aeon.com<\/em> – April 7, 2016)<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

On a hopefully lighter (!) note, this post ends with two illustrations that graced the interior of the April 1966 issue of Galaxy<\/em>, both of which complemented Jack Vance\u2019s remarkable Hugo and Nebula Award winning novella, \u201cThe Last Castle\u201d.\u00a0 They’re by science-fiction artist Jack Gaughan.\u00a0 They show a Phane and a Mek.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

To learn more, you can read about “The Last Castle” at Battered, Tattered, Yellowed, & Creased<\/a>.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

(For more literary illustrations, particularly from the \u201cGolden Age\u201d of science-fiction, you might want to visit: http:\/\/wordsenvisioned.com\/<\/a>.) [Shameless plug.]<\/em><\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Notes<\/span><\/p>\n

(1) From Wikipedia:\u00a0 New York City\u2019s Transport Workers Union, and, Amalgamated Transit Union, called a strike against the city\u2019s Transit Authority on January 1.\u00a0 The strike was resolved by the 13th, through a package comprising, \u201cwages increases from $3.18 to $4.14 an hour, an additional paid holiday, increased pension benefits, and other gains.\u201d\u00a0 The strike also resulted in the passage of the Taylor Law, which defined, \u201crights and limitations of unions for public employees in New York.\u201d
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

(2) Also known as \u201cISI\u201d; later \u201cThomson-ISI\u201d, then the Intellectual Property & Science business of Thomson Reuters; now \u201cClarivate Analytics\u201d.\u00a0 The title of the enterprise\u2019s next iteration – should one occur – is unknown. <\/span><\/p>\n

References<\/span><\/p>\n

New York City 1966 Transit Strike, at<\/span>
\n https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/1966_New_York_City_transit_strike<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Frederick Pohl (biography), at:<\/span>
\n https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Frederik_Pohl<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Last Castle\u201d (by Jack Vance), at:<\/span>
\n https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Last_Castle_(novella)<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

PHANE<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/a>____________________<\/span><\/p>\n

MEK
\n<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Over five decades ago, multiple Hugo and Nebula Award winner Frederick Pohl wrote an editorial entitled “Where the Jobs Go”, which appeared in the April, 1966 edition of of Galaxy Science Fiction.\u00a0 The impetus for his essay was the New York City Transit Strike of January, 1966 (1).\u00a0 That event created an intellectual springboard for … Continue reading Technology, Work, and The Future II: “Where The Jobs Go”: The View From Galaxy Science Fiction<\/em> in 1966<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,7,2],"tags":[221,291,290,292,325,324,314,338,293,46,294],"class_list":["post-2009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-sociology","category-technology","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-frederick-pohl","tag-galaxy-science-fiction","tag-institute-for-scientific-information","tag-isi-inc","tag-jack-gaughan","tag-jack-vance","tag-new-york-city-transit-strike-of-1966","tag-new-york-transit-workers-union","tag-technological-unemployment","tag-the-last-castle"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2009"}],"version-history":[{"count":44,"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2327,"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2009\/revisions\/2327"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thepastpresented.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home4/emc2ftl3/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5493